Garrett Smith Labs
Search NotesAsk vGarrettAsk

Reviews

Google Gets More Yelpian With New Review Policies

Recently updated rules around influencing customer reviews are a slippery slope

By Garrett Smith ·

ReviewsGoogle's new review policies sound reasonable but enforcement looks Yelp-like, plus what to stop, keep, and document.4 min read · Search Notes

Google updated its review policies last month. You may have already heard.

On paper, it sounds reasonable. No incentivizing reviews. No asking customers to mention employees by name. No pressuring people to leave reviews while they're still in your store.

In practice? This is going to be a mess.

What changed:

Google added explicit language banning a few things that have been common practice for years:

  • Asking customers to mention a staff member by name in their review
  • Tying employee bonuses or quotas to review generation
  • Using kiosks or tablets for on-site review collection
  • "Pressuring" customers to leave reviews while on premises

They also doubled down on review gating (pre-screening customers before sending review links) and incentivized reviews (discounts, freebies, anything of value in exchange for feedback).

Google's 2025 Trust and Safety Report says they removed 292 million policy-violating reviews last year. So enforcement is real.

Here's my problem with this:

The policies sound clean. The enforcement won't be.

How exactly does Google distinguish between:

  • A customer who genuinely loved Jake the technician and mentioned him by name
  • A customer who was asked to mention Jake

Both reviews look identical. Both are technically "real." One is now a policy violation.

Google says they're using AI to detect "unnatural patterns" — like reviews that consistently mention full names in ways real customers "almost never do organically."

But customers DO mention names organically. Especially when someone does exceptional work. Especially in service businesses where the relationship is personal.

So now what? Google's AI flags a pattern, removes a bunch of legitimate reviews, and you're left trying to prove a negative?

This feels familiar.

If you've dealt with Yelp, you know how this goes.

Yelp's filter has been removing legitimate reviews for years based on opaque algorithms that nobody fully understands. Businesses watch real customer reviews disappear into the "not recommended" graveyard with no explanation and no recourse.

Google used to be the friendly alternative. Your reviews showed up. The system was transparent. You knew where you stood.

Now we're getting Yelp energy.

Policies that sound reasonable but create enforcement nightmares. AI that flags patterns without understanding context. Businesses doing extra work to stay compliant with rules that might hit them anyway.

The slippery slope:

Here's where this gets uncomfortable.

The policy says merchants can't request "specific content" in reviews.

Okay — no asking for name mentions. Don’t tell them to say I am the greatest plumber in Buffalo, NY since Mario and Luigi. I get that.

But some practitioners are reading this more broadly. Does "specific content" include asking customers to mention the service used? A product? Their experience with a specific part of your business?

"If you loved your new roof, we'd appreciate a review" — is that influencing content?

Google hasn't clarified. Which means businesses are left guessing where the line is.

And when you're guessing, you either:

  • Over-comply and neuter your review strategy entirely
  • Keep doing what you've been doing and hope you don't get flagged

Neither is great.

What I'd actually do:

Look — I'm not saying ignore the policy. Google removed 292 million reviews last year. They're serious. We see it all the time.

But I'm also not panicking.

Here's the practical approach:

Stop the obvious stuff:

  • Kill any employee bonus tied to being mentioned in reviews
  • Stop asking for specific content in your review requests
  • Ditch any tech or tools that force positive reviews to Google

Keep the reasonable stuff:

  • Ask every customer for a review (not just happy ones)
  • Make it easy with a link or QR code
  • Follow up after they've left, not while they're standing there
  • Let them write whatever they want

Watch your velocity:

  • Sudden spikes in reviews trigger scrutiny
  • Consistent, steady review flow looks organic
  • If you're doing a big push, spread it out over more time

Document your process:

  • If Google flags you, you want to be able to show your review request is compliant
  • "We send the same email to every customer 24 hours after service" is defensible
  • "Our staff asks for 5-star reviews at checkout" is not
  • Use software that allows you to save a backup of your reviews in case they vanish

The uncomfortable truth:

Google is making the review game harder. Not because these policies are wrong — most of them make sense in theory.

But the enforcement is going to create collateral damage. Legitimate reviews will get caught in the filter. Businesses doing nothing wrong will lose reviews because their patterns "looked suspicious."

And when that happens, good luck getting Google to fix it.

We've seen this movie before. It's called Yelp.

I'm not saying Google is there yet. But the direction is clear.

The platforms that businesses depend on are getting less friendly, more opaque, and more willing to remove content based on algorithmic suspicion rather than actual violations.

Plan accordingly.

Talk soon, Garrett

P.S. — If you've already seen reviews disappear since April, I'd love to hear about it. Get in touch and tell me what happened. I'm trying to understand how aggressive enforcement actually is in the wild.

First sent to the newsletter on April 27, 2026. All Search Notes